Free Download Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible
When seeing this page, you have chosen that you will get this book in conveniently method, have not you? Yeah, that holds true. You could conveniently get the book right here. By seeing this site, you could discover the connect to connect to the collection as well as publisher of Genesis And The Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible So, you can obtain is as easy as feasible. It means additionally that you will not run out of this publication. Nonetheless, this site likewise brings you a lot more collections as well as groups of publications from many sources. So, just remain in this site every time you will certainly seek for the books.
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible
Free Download Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible
The supreme sales letter will give you a distinctive book to overcome you life to a lot better. Reserve, as one of the referral to obtain numerous sources can be taken into consideration as one that will connect the life to the experience to the knowledge. By having publication to check out, you have tried to link your life to be much better. It will urge your quality not just for your life however additionally individuals around you.
The very first factor of why selecting this publication is since it's used in soft file. It means that you could save it not only in one device but additionally bring it all over. Genesis And The Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible will certainly showcase just how deep the book will certainly provide for you. It will certainly provide you something new. Also this is only a book; the visibility will really show how you take the inspirations. And also currently, when you really need to make take care of this book, you can begin to get it.
You may not feel that this publication will be as crucial as you assume now, yet are you certain? Find out more about Genesis And The Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible and also you could actually discover the advantages of reading this publication. The offered soft file publication of this title will certainly provide the outstanding situation. Also reading is just leisure activity; you can start to be success b this book. Assume extra in judging guides. You might not evaluate that it's important or not currently. Read this book in soft data as well as get the ways of you to save it.
To earn sure, lots of people also have downloaded and install the soft data of Genesis And The Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible though this website. Just by clicking link that is provided, you could go directly to the book. Again, this publication will be actually crucial for you to check out, even they are easy, as well as they will certainly lead you to be the far better life. So, just what do you consider this updated book collection? Let's check it now and also get ready making this book as absolutely your collection and reading materials. Believe it!
About the Author
Gerald Schroeder is an applied physicist and an applied theologian who received his undergraduate and doctoral degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. A resident of Jerusalem and a lecturer and adviser around the world, his research has been reported in Newsweek, The Jerusalem Post, and numerous scholarly publications.
Read more
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 1 The Search Know what to answer a skeptic. —Talmud For the last few years, I have had a continuing debate with my son Joshua. By the age of eight, Josh had already completed five years of biblical study. He had been taught to relate to the Bible in its most literal sense, and so for him, and for many of his teachers, the age of the universe is exactly the age derived from the generations as they are listed in the Bible. This comes to approximately 57 centuries. For them, the cosmological estimate of the age of the universe, some 15 billion years, is a preposterous fiction. According to a literal reading of the Bible, six days is stated as the time between “the beginning” and the appearance of man—and six days it is. As we shall learn, the forebears of this same biblical tradition were well aware that a theology devoid of knowledge of the physical universe was (and is) a contradiction in terms. The implications of general relativity and Doppler shifts in light are an essential part in understanding the opening chapters of Genesis. Although the insights provided by modern science have yet to be assimilated by many contemporary teachers of Genesis, we shall find that they are a help rather than a hindrance toward the rapprochement of the secular and nonsecular. The discrepancy between the 5700-year biblical age of the universe and the 15-billion-year scientific estimate might not have caused the family debate that led me to write Genesis and the Big Bang had there not been one, almost extraneous, circumstance in our lives. That circumstance was a nearby archaeological dig. For three years we lived in Zikhron Ya’aqov, a village on the Carmel range overlooking Israel’s coastal plain. The plain is bounded on the west by the Mediterranean. A few kilometers inland from the shore, the massive limestone outcrop of the Carmel range rises abruptly to form the plain’s eastern boundary. It is a wonderfully productive area. This is especially true of the region between Zikhron Ya’aqov and Haifa. Here rows of avocado and orange trees, heavy with foliage and fruit, border the blue-green waters filling acres of fishponds. These ponds share space with white-specked fields of cotton. The productivity of the area is probably not new. Archaeological evidence indicates that this land has provided its material abundance to man and his predecessors for tens of thousands of years. A few kilometers north of our village, among scrub growth halfway up the steep face of Mt. Carmel, the yawning black openings of several particularly large caves appear as sentinels overseeing the coast. On two or three occasions, my family and I have scrambled up Mt. Carmel to explore the archaeological digs within the caves. It is these digs that are the source of my continuing debate with Josh. Here artifacts and fossils of that prehistoric animal, Neanderthal man, have been found. For the theologian steeped in a superficial reading of Genesis, these fossils may be Neanderthal, but they have nothing to do with man! For the paleontologist, the age of the fossils also presents a problem, but of a different sort. The bones of Neanderthal man are too old to date using carbon-14 methods. So much of the original skeletal carbon-14 has decayed (one-half the original content decays radioactively each 5,600 years) that the small amount of carbon-14 remaining cannot be reliably measured. The bones’ location within geologically known strata gives them an estimated age of 60,000 years.4 For Josh and for many other people, Jew and Christian alike, a 60,000-year archaeological history is at least 54,000 years in error. It is totally at odds with a literal understanding of the opening chapters of the book of Genesis. But this discord between archaeology and theology is neither necessary nor valid. As I have studied the details of biblical and scientific texts, I have reached what was for me an enlightening and unexpected conclusion: The biblical narrative and the scientific account of our genesis are two mutually compatible descriptions of the same, single, and identical reality. My goal in this book is to explain that compatibility to expert and layperson alike. Simply stated, I will discuss here the first week of Genesis. To the literalist, these first six days can be a problem. Fossils place the appearance of beings with humanlike features at well over the 60,000-year age of the Neanderthal fossils of the Carmel caves. Although dating the time of Peking man’s existence has the same types of problems as those encountered when dating the remains of Neanderthal man, the archaeological estimate is that these humanlike animals lived some 300,000 years ago. Their home, near Cho-k’ou-tien, China, was in a group of limestone caves quite similar to those found in the Carmel range. Homo erectus, the genus and species to which Peking man belonged, made its appearance 1.5 to 2 million years ago. Because of this antiquity, only a few nearly complete Homo erectus skeletons have been found. One of these, located in what is now an arid region of Kenya, is the Lake Turkana Boy. It is estimated that the lad lived his twelve years of life 1.6 million years ago. Looking at this fossil, it is clear that, except for the shortened forehead, these early hominids had features so similar to modern humans that they could go unnoticed if they walked on a busy city street. But does mankind’s history really stretch back a million years, or even several tens of thousands of years? A strictly literal view of the Bible would say no. To the literalist, there was no prehistoric man. Adam was the first man and he was formed some 5700 years ago from the dust of the Earth (Gen. 2:7). Part of the contradiction between archaeological evidence and biblical tradition is semantic, originating in the use of the word man. Archaeologists use the term to describe prehistoric animals that had some, but not necessarily all, of the features of modern man. Biblically speaking, the term man is applicable only to Adam and his progeny. It is, however, no secret that the divergent views of science and tradition are based on differences far more fundamental than the definition of words. In fact, most biblical commentators accept that the meaning of words of the Bible, especially as in the creation story, must be understood in accordance with their context. The terms for water, darkness, wind, heavens, and earth as used in the first ten verses of Genesis have meanings that are quite different when used later on in the Bible. It is the calendar of the early universe that raises a discrepancy far more difficult to explain than the variances in terminology. Entire herds of fossilized rhinoceroses, their calves nestled between their legs in nursing position, have been dated by the potassium-argon content of the volcanic ash that buried them, as having lived 10 million years ago. Dinosaurs have been firmly established, at least according to paleontologists’ data, to have roamed the Earth for 100 million years, becoming extinct some 65 million years ago. The simplest forms of life, the early prokaryotic (nucleus-free) bacteria and blue-green algae, make their first fossil appearance in earliest sedimentary rocks. These are dated as being 3 to 4 billion years old. The oldest rocks are only some 600 million years older. These are the original igneous rocks. The length of this fossil record certainly seems to contradict the relatively brief period of creation and genesis presented by the Bible. And yet the fossil record covers only a fraction of the age that current cosmological observations ascribe to our universe. Where do the preponderance of paleontological and astronomical data, indicating an Earth some 4.5 billion years old and a universe that reaches back 10 to 20 billion years, fit into traditional biblical scholarship? At first it would appear that these findings put paleontology hopelessly at odds with the Bible. For the total cosmic evolution from the creation (the “In the beginning …” of Genesis 1:1) to the appearance of Adam gets only a bit more than five biblical days. As an affirmation of faith, the literalist can explain the paleontological finds as having been placed in rocks at creation by the Creator. They might be there to satisfy man’s need to rationalize the nature of the world, or to test man’s belief in the biblical narrative. This argument, while impossible to disprove, is the weakest of reeds (Isa. 36:6) in a world full of explosive and convincing discovery. Some theologians argue that the methods of paleontological dating are flawed. These methods depend on measurements of radioactive decay. They claim that the rates of decay today are not the same as in prehistoric times. If this were true, the ages of fossils or rocks could not be estimated from current measurements of radioactivity.
Read more
Product details
Paperback: 224 pages
Publisher: Bantam; Reprint edition (December 1, 1991)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0553354132
ISBN-13: 978-0553354133
Product Dimensions:
5.3 x 0.5 x 8.2 inches
Shipping Weight: 7.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.4 out of 5 stars
124 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#164,375 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
This is the best treatment I’ve seen of the topic of reconciling Genesis with the scientific data that the universe is 13.7 Billion years old. Although the book is self contained, those not previously exposed to Einstein’s Theories of special and general relativity may struggle with some parts of this book. Those theories are explained, but the treatment is brief for those not already familiar Einstein’s work.The author is a Jew, and it is amazing that he cites ancient Jewish sages that figured out Genesis centuries before Einstein was even born.I seldom recommend books, but I can endorse this one for those who are willing to put a little effort into the reading. If you are already comfortable with Relativity theory this is not a difficult book. It is not a Science book, but offers a compelling interpretation of Genesis that completely reconciles the Biblical account with modern science.The book is orthodox in that it does consider Adam to be the first human. The book also demonstrates that the Biblical and Archaeological timelines agree for all events AFTER the creation of Adam. For this reason, it says nothing that would offend a Young Earth Creationist.To oversimplify, the Genesis account can be taken literally for all events AFTER the creation of Adam. Events prior to that, however must take into account the effect of Relativity on the observers perception of elapsed time. The book agrees 100% with the order of events of Creation, and explains the seeming difficulties such as light being created before the Sun.I’m familiar with most of the attempts to reconcile the Genesis account with Science, but this is the only one I’ve seen that doesn’t have holes. I again repeat my surprise that Jewish Sages arrived at essentially the same interpretation of the Genesis creation account hundreds of years before the scientific rationale was known.
Eye opening and brings Christian and Jewish insights together. Best part - harmonizes the 6 days of creation with the 14 billion year age of the universe. Those calculations are left out of the book but he strongly hints at it. You can go online to discover the space-time versus “earth-time†Resolution in his post there. Read this book! It will help end the snarky whining of skeptics who don’t get it
When Torah and natural science seem to conflict, one or the other is being incorrectly interpreted. That's the principle Gerald Schroeder propounds and defends in this remarkable volume. And I can only think that Moses Maimonides would have been delighted.What Schroeder argues, basically, is that the biblical account of creation in six days can be read as taking place over six _literal_ days -- and that not only does this reading fail to conflict with modern science, indeed science itself supports that reading. The solution? The six days are "God's time," reckoned from within one frame of reference, and the millions of years with which science deals are "earth time," reckoned from within another. The two are reconciled by the theory of relativity. Moreover, this reading is firmly grounded in traditional Jewish texts that predated the theory of relativity by one or two thousand years.I'll let Schroeder fill you in on the details. But whether those details are sound or not, his _approach_ is refreshingly sane.On the one hand, we have various sorts of Bible-thumper insisting that all our knowledge must come from the Word of God and nothing else -- an insistence that turns easily into anti-intellectual ranting against science. On the other, we have various sorts of scientistic yahoo insisting that religion is bunk and science is the royal road to truth.Rubbish, on both counts. The Torah does indeed bear signs that it is a Divine communication, and people who believe this are being entirely reasonable. (See, e.g., Lawrence Kelemen's _Permission To Receive_ for a defense of this view.) However, the Bible itself insists that human beings are made in the Divine image, that rationality is that very image, and that the "natural" universe provides abundant evidence of the workings of the Divine. And it is _this_ view, in one form or another, which -- as a matter of history and logic -- gave rise to modern science in the first place; without the "substrate" of rationalism implied by the view that the entire universe is the creation of a single rational Mind, "empirical" science can't even get started. There's no need to decide between the Bible and science; they can't really be separated anyway.So it may be that some of Schroeder's details require revision (and I understand that some of them are in fact revised in his next book, _The Science of God_). Nevertheless the lesson to learn from this book is still sound: that whenever science and Torah seem to be at odds with one another, the proper procedure is to suspend final judgment, think, and wait. Further information may provide unexpected resolutions.(And by the way, the review below picks on Schroeder for an absolutely ridiculous "error." The big, round figures used in those calculations aren't anywhere near precise enough to locate us in the "middle of the fifth day" as opposed to the sixth, and Schroeder doesn't say they are.)
Can you be a creationist and an evolutionist?Gerald Schroeder's answer, validated through the use of einstein's special and general relativity, fossil records, trends in biological organizations, and of course biblical statements and commentaries, is an astounding YES.How is it possible?The bible says the world was created in 6 days and in one day he rested.The answer is time dilation. What might be perceived as 6 24 hour days might actually have been reflective of a much longer timespan (15 billion years).And how do we explain the Neanderthal man or Homo erectus, when the bible tells us Adam and Eve were created 5768 years ago?The answer is Neshamah ("soul" in hebrew). God gave Adam and Eve soul, something that was not given to the earlier forms of man-like creatures.This book is filled with more interesting insight showing the mutual agreements between the biblical explanation for the creation of life, and the modern perspectives on origins of life as researched by modern physicists, chemists, and biologists.I highly recommend this book for those interested in origins of life and religion.
If you want to lead agnostics and atheists to Christ - you really ought to read this.
Just started reading but glad the book came nicely made.
Very informative.
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible PDF
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible EPub
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible Doc
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible iBooks
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible rtf
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible Mobipocket
Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible Kindle